Reflection 4

Norm-referenced standardized test score VS criterion-referenced test scores

I think no matter a teacher develops a lesson or a test, it is important to bear in mind that purpose is always a matter. Having a clear purpose, teachers will have a basic understanding of what he needs for assessing students. This week lecture introduces two terms “norm-referenced standardized test score” or “criterion-referenced test scores”. It’s sad to say sometimes, “norm-referenced standardized test score” is commonly adopted by most of the universities, in which some capable students may not achieve what they deserve as there are set target numbers in each grade level. Norm-referenced standardized test (NRT) score system does not necessarily mean less cooperation and collaboration between one another, and a less friendly study atmosphere. According to me personal experience, every student always strives for their best to achieve higher score, cooperate with school mates even more closely,  brainstorm ideas together, and give excellent academic performance as this system encourages the best to strive for the best. I do understand the competitiveness and competence of students may directly result in a good reputation of a tertiary institute.

Of course, criterion-referenced test scores (CRT) also suitable in some situation (but it also depends on what the test is going to be used for). I was a coordinator in my mother school when I first became an alumnus. I helped my school in new student intake process and had the experience of setting a test with my teachers. We used CRT for the entrance test (admission) to measure capacity or potential to learn in a level, in which the student’s abilities are most likely above average to study in our school. In this case, CRT is more suitable than NRT. All in all, purpose is always an important issue to think about before deciding which test score system to be used.